
Krystal Seeks Approval for Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa Gene Therapy
B-VEC recently showed efficacy in the phase 3 GEM-3 trial.
Krystal Biotech has submitted a biologics license application (BLA) for B-VEC (beremagene geperpavec), its gene therapy for the potential treatment of dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DEB).1
The BLA submission is based off positive data from the phase 1/2 GEM-1/2 study (NCT03536143) and the
“The unmet medical need for DEB patients remains very high and our relentless pursuit of a treatment for this disease continues with the same sense of urgency that we have always had since the founding of Krystal Biotech,” Suma Krishnan, president, research & development, Krystal, said in a statement.1 “We look forward to working with the FDA in its review of our BLA submission.”
B-VEC is a topical, re-dosable gene therapy. It is directly applied to DEB wounds and delivers 2 copies of the COL7A1 gene directly to the skin to make functional COL7 protein. Krystal plans to submit a marketing authorization application with the EMA in the second half of 2022.
WATCH NOW:
The GEM-1/2 trial was a single-center, randomized, intra-patient placebo-controlled, open-label trial that enrolled 9 patients with dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa patients evaluated over 12 weeks. The trial met both its mechanistic and clinical endpoints and investigators found that B-VEC was well-tolerated with no serious treatment-related adverse events (AEs).
Recently in the GEM-3 study, investigators found that a significantly greater proportion of wounds treated with B-VEC exhibited complete wound healing compared with placebo at 3 months (absolute difference, 50.3% [95% CI, 28.7-72.0]; P <.005) and 6 months (absolute difference, 45.8% [95% CI, 23.6-68.0%]; P <.005).2 Almost half (49.7%) of wounds treated with B-VEC were completely healed at both 3 and 6 months compared with 7.1% of wounds treated with placebo, demonstrating durability of response. Most wounds (66.7%; n = 14) closed at 3 months were also closed at 6 months, compared with 33.3% of placebo-treated wounds meeting the same endpoint (P = .02).
Pain and patient-reported outcome data were also positive, with a significant change from baseline in pain response at week 22 (P = .02), and near-significant changes at weeks 24 (P = .07) and 26 (P = .06). There was also a trend toward decreased pain in B-VEC versus placebo treated wounds. Improvements from baseline were also seen in patient-reported outcome measures such as EQ-5D-5L and Skindex-29. Safety findings were similar between GEM-1/2 and GEM-3, and the therapy continues to be well-tolerated.
“It’s the very first topical gene replacement therapy in dermatology... We've seen success in the phase 3 trial and it may be the case that more dermatologists will be seeing these patients come in since the therapy is so easy to do,” Marinkovich said in an
























