
Kristina Jordahl, PhD, on Arlo-Cel's Potential to Destroy Multiple Myeloma Cells While Preserving Immune Function
The principal scientist at Bristol Myers Squibb discussed a biomarker analysis she presented at ASCO's 2025 meeting.
Bristol Myers Squibb's GPRC5D-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy arlocabtagene autoleucel (arlo-cel) is currently being evaluated for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) in a phase 2 clinical trial (QUINTESSENTIAL; NCT06297226) and in a phase 1 clinical trial (NCT04674813). A biomarker analysis of data from the phase 1 trial, comparing it to data from the phase 2 KarMMa clinical trial (NCT03361748) evaluating BCMA-directed CAR-T idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) for the treatment of MM, was presented at
In an interview with CGTLive®, Kristina Jordahl, PhD, a principal scientist at Bristol Myers Squibb who presented the data at ASCO, discussed the results and their implications. She noted that the data indicates that the GPRC5D-targeted CAR-T may be better able to spare normal plasma cells while maintaining a similar or better efficacy to ide-cel at destroying MM cells.
CGTLive: Can you give some background context about your presentation?
Kristina Jordahl, PhD: This work builds on evidence that GPRC5D has minimal expression on normal plasma cells, despite strong expression on MM cells. Prior research has also described greater depletion of mature B-cells and normal plasma cells from BCMA-targeted as compared to GPRC5D-targeted T-cell engager therapy.
What are some of the key data points you are presenting?
After arlo-cel treatment, we observed that the uninvolved free light chain (FLC) does not clear to the limit of detection in 33% of patients and, when cleared, arlo-cel had a median time to return of 3.3 months with circulating levels that are significantly higher at months 4 and 5. This possible preservation of normal plasma cell function with similar or better targeting of MM cells suggests that arlo-cel has the potential for lower burden of infections while also reducing use of infection-related interventions.
How would you summarize the big-picture implications that doctors and the broader healthcare community should take away from this new data?
We characterized an observation that FLC profiles from patients treated with arlo-cel are distinct from those from patients treated with BCMA-targeting CAR-T. The results are presented as biomarker-based evidence of higher levels of normal plasma cells with a GPRC5D target as compared to a BCMA target. If clinical evidence continues to support greater antitumor specificity and preservation of humoral immunity, arlo-cel may have the potential to achieve lower rates of hypogammaglobulinemia and infections compared to BCMA-targeting therapies, with fewer interventions.
What are the next steps for this research?
We look forward to continuing to monitor the observation that targeting GPRC5D with CAR-T results in preservation of the humoral immune system in ongoing phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials. Possible next steps also include additional data to support the preservation of the humoral immune system, including direct measurement of the B-cell and normal plasma cell levels after treatment.
Is there anything else you want to share with our audience?
Arlo-cel is a GPRC5D-targeted CAR T-cell therapy with impressive efficacy and a manageable safety profile. Advantages to targeting the GPRC5D antigen with CAR-T in MM may include lower severity of on-target off-tumor toxicity and sparing of the humoral immune system.
This transcript has been edited for clarity.






















