Axi-Cel Active in Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Lymphomas Irrespective of Chemo Sensitivity

Article

Responsiveness to treatment received immediately prior to CAR T-cell therapy may not be associated with post–CAR T outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who receive axicabtagene ciloleucel.

Responsiveness to treatment received immediately prior to CAR T-cell therapy may not be associated with post–CAR T outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who receive axicabtagene ciloleucel.

Responsiveness to treatment received immediately prior to CAR T-cell therapy may not be associated with post–CAR T outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who receive axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel; Yescarta), according to data from a study presented during the 2021 Transplantation & Cellular Therapy Meetings.1

At a median follow-up of 5.9 months (range, 0.9-31.1), the overall response rate (ORR) achieved by patients who received the CAR T-cell therapy was 63.3%, with 30% of patients experiencing a complete response (CR). As of the last follow-up, approximately half, or 55%, of all patients maintained a response to treatment, while 31.7% (n = 19) had died. Specifically, 84.2% (n = 16) died due to progressive disease.

At 1 month, response to axi-cel was strongly linked with better overall survival (OS; HR, 11.82; 95% CI, 3.72-37.54; P <.0001) and progression-free survival (PFS; hazard ratio [HR], 6.44; 95% CI, 2.46-16.87; P <.0001). Patient responsiveness to last therapy received before the CAR T-cell therapy was not found to be significantly associated with changes in either OS (P = .66) or PFS (P = .39).

Moreover, investigators did not observe differences in OS (P = .47) or PFS (P = .64) after designating patients into 2 subgroups based on response: those who did respond versus those who did not. Little difference was observed with regard to ORR between responders and non-responders, at 77.3% and 64.7%, respectively. The number of previous lines of therapy, primary refractory disease, histology, myc/bcl2 status, pre-CAR T bridging therapy, and site of residual disease were not found to be linked with changes in survival.

Although axi-cel has demonstrated efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL, the association of sensitivity to pre-CAR T chemoimmunotherapy with response to the product is not currently known. To this end, investigators launched the single-institution study to compare the outcomes of patients who had chemotherapy-sensitive disease prior to CAR T-cell therapy with those with unresponsive and refractory disease.

The study included patients with DLBCL who consecutively received axi-cel. Positron emission tomography (PET) and computer tomography scans were done prior to treatment with axi-cel, 28 days after infusion, and at the time of the last follow-up. Responses were defined per the Lugano criteria. Both OS and PFS were estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method, and hazard ratios were estimated using Cox proportional hazard models.

In total, 60 patients with relapsed/refractory disease underwent apheresis for axi-cel, 75.0% (n = 45) of whom had primary DLBCL. The remaining patients had either transformed follicular lymphoma (20.0%; n = 12), primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (3.3%; n = 2), or high-grade B-cell lymphoma (1.7%; n = 1).

The median age of the participants was 62 years, with 36.7% (n = 22) of patients over the age of 65 years, and the majority of population where male (66.7%; n = 40). Additionally, 31.7% (n = 19) of patients received more than 3 prior lines of therapy, and 70.0% (n = 42) received treatment for primary refractory disease. More than half (56.7%; n = 34) of all patients received a bridging therapy prior to undergoing CAR T-cell infusion and 26.7% (n = 16) of patients had previously received a stem cell transplant. Moreover, 35% of patients had received a novel drug prior to CAR T-cell infusion, and 36.7% of patients responded to their last therapy prior to axi-cel.

When evaluating response to the CAR T-cell therapy at PET-1, 30.0% (n = 18) of patients experienced a CR, 33.3% (n = 20) achieved a PR, and 15.0% (n = 9) had disease stability. Fifteen percent (n = 9) of patients experienced progressive disease.

At a median follow-up of 4.78 months (95% CI, 0.96-31.1), the time of the last follow-up, 35.0% of patients (n = 21) had a CR and 20.0% had a partial response (PR; n = 12). Additionally, 3.3% of patients (n = 2) achieved stable disease, while 8.3% (n = 5) experienced progressive disease. At this time, 33.3% (n = 20) of patients were deceased.

Investigators reported an incidence rate of 10% for grade 3/4 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and 16.7% for grade 3/4 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. In total, 76.7% of patients (n = 46) experienced CRS with axi-cel, 51.7% (n = 31) experienced central nervous system toxicity, and 48.3% (n = 29) experienced both.

Based on these findings, investigators concluded that these data support the use of CAR T-cell therapy in patients with refractory and unresponsive lymphoma, provided that they are otherwise eligible for treatment.

Reference

  1. Iovino L, Wu V, Voutsinas J, et al. Non-responsiveness to immediate pre CAR-T treatment does not preclude response to axicabtagene ciloleucel in relapsed and refractory aggressive B cell lymphomas. Poster presented at: 2021 Transplantation & Cellular Therapy Meetings; February 8-12, 2021; Virtual. Poster 416.
Recent Videos
Haydar Frangoul, MD, the medical director of pediatric hematology/oncology at Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Pediatric Transplant and Cellular Therapy Program at TriStar Centennial
Georg Schett, MD, vice president research and chair of internal medicine at the University of Erlangen – Nuremberg
Bhagirathbhai R. Dholaria, MD, an associate professor of medicine in malignant hematology & stem cell transplantation at Vanderbilt University Medical Center
R. Nolan Townsend; Sandi See Tai, MD; Kim G. Johnson, MD
Arun Upadhyay, PhD, the chief scientific officer and head of research, development, and Medical at Ocugen
Arun Upadhyay, PhD, the chief scientific officer and head of research, development, and Medical at Ocugen
Barry J. Byrne, MD, PhD, the chief medical advisor of Muscular Dystrophy Association (MDA) and a physician-scientist at the University of Florida
John Brandsema, MD, a pediatric neurologist in the Division of Neurology at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia
Chun-Yu Chen, PhD, a research scientist at Seattle Children’s Research Institute
Related Content
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.