HER2-Specific CAR T-Cell Therapy Active in Progressive Glioblastoma

Article

Administration of autologous HER2-specific CAR-modified virus specific T Cells was safe and had clinical benefit for some patients with progressive glioblastoma, a disease with limited effective therapeutic options.

Administration of autologous HER2-specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified virus specific T Cells (VSTs) was safe and had clinical benefit for some patients with progressive glioblastoma, a disease with limited effective therapeutic options.

Results of a small phase I study of this monotherapy were published in JAMA Oncology, by Nabil Ahmed, MD, MPH, of Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, and colleagues.

“CAR T-cell therapies are an attractive strategy to improve the outcomes for patients with glioblastoma,” they wrote. “In our study, we infused HER2-CAR VSTs intravenously because T cells can travel to the brain after intravenous injections, as evidenced by clinical responses after the infusion of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes for melanoma brain metastasis and by detection of CD19-CAR T cells in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with B-precursor leukemia.”

The study included 17 patients with progressive HER2-positive glioblastoma (10 patients aged 18 or older; 7 patients younger than 18). Patients were given one or more infusions of autologous VSTs specific for cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, or adenovirus and genetically modified to express HER2-CARs. Six patients were given multiple infusions.

Infusions were well tolerated with no dose limiting toxicities presenting. Two patients had grade 2 seizures and/or headaches, which the researchers wrote were “probably related to the T-cell infusion.”

Although HER2-CAR VSTs did not expand, they were detected in the peripheral blood for up to 12 months after the infusion.

“Although we did not observe an expansion of HER2-CAR VSTs in the peripheral blood, T cells could have expanded at glioblastoma sites. At 6 weeks after T-cell infusion, the MRI scans of patients 3, 7, 10, 16, and 17 showed an increase in peritumoral edema,” the researchers wrote. “Although these patients were classified as having a progressive disease, it is likely that the imaging changes for some of these patients were due to inflammatory responses, indicative of local T-cell expansion, especially since these patients survived for more than 6 months.”

Only 16 of the 17 patients were evaluable for response. Patients underwent brain MRI 6 weeks after T-cell infusion. One patient had a partial response for longer than 9 months and seven patients had stable disease for between 8 weeks to 29 months. Three patients with stable disease are alive without any evidence of progression from 24 to 29 months of follow-up. Eight patients progressed after the infusion.

The median overall survival was 11.1 months from the first T-cell infusion and 24.5 months from diagnosis.

The researchers noted that the inclusion of children in the study, who have a better prognosis than adults, may have affected the results; however, “there was no significant difference between the survival probability for children and that for adults in this clinical study.”

Related Videos
Frederick “Eric” Arnold, PhD
Genovefa (Zenia) Papanicolaou, MD, an infectious diseases specialist at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Jeffrey Chamberlain, PhD, on Exciting New Research at MDA 2024
Alan Beggs, PhD, on Challenges in Therapeutic Development for Rare Diseases
Akshay Sharma, MBBS, a bone marrow transplant physician at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital
PJ Brooks, PhD
John DiPersio, MD, PhD, the director of the Center for Gene and Cellular Immunotherapy at Washington University School of Medicine
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.